Who should we vote for in the coming elections?
Page 1 of 1 • Share •
Who should we vote for in the coming elections?
I was wondering what your thoughts were on who we should vote for? I was thinking of maybe making a list of pros and cons about each party as I've still no idea who I'm going to vote for.
So I shall kick this off with a couple of cons each.
Conservatives:
So I shall kick this off with a couple of cons each.
Conservatives:
- Cameron comes across like a used car sales man.
- Unbelievably still haven't come up with a new policy all year (at least not that I've heard)
- Seem pretty corrupt
- Are slowly eroding our civil liberties and are unable to put anyone sane in the home office.
- Seem pretty corrupt
- Have been in power too long.
- Wasted vote conundrum?
- Any truth in the claim they aren't currently capable of being an effective government?
- The fact that I'm struggling to think of anything particularly bad about them as they don't get much press suggests maybe there are hidden evils I don't know of.
_________________
Mark: Look if I break up with her I don't see myself having good sex ever again... unless I'm like going on holiday to Hawaii, and the plane crashes and all my fellow survivors are women sex therapists on their way to a conference. And even then, there would probably be loads of male sex therapists there too and they would love that wouldn't they? All fucking each other and giving each other tips while I sit on a rock wanking and crying..
Paulio- Admin

- Posts: 179
Join date: 2008-01-23
Age: 22

Re: Who should we vote for in the coming elections?
ooh i like this cons business
Labour
1. They have a wheezing grandfather clock instead of a leader.
2. Ridiculous amount of in-fighting between Blairites and the Brownikins.
3. Inevitably defeat?
Conservatives
1. The lack of policies make them seem like a repeat of New Labour, the difference being the overuse of the word "change" instead of "new".
2. Boris Johnson
3. David Cameron doesn't strike me as used cars salesman. He strikes me as more incompetent than that. Blair was a used cars salesman, a talented one who could sell water to the ocean. Cameron strikes me as a lucky bastard, who is in the right place at the right time.
Liberal Democrats
1. The leader is around 12 years old
2. Always finish 3rd. A throwaway vote.
3. Paul is right.. No other negatives but i bet that there isn't many positives either.
Labour
1. They have a wheezing grandfather clock instead of a leader.
2. Ridiculous amount of in-fighting between Blairites and the Brownikins.
3. Inevitably defeat?
Conservatives
1. The lack of policies make them seem like a repeat of New Labour, the difference being the overuse of the word "change" instead of "new".
2. Boris Johnson
3. David Cameron doesn't strike me as used cars salesman. He strikes me as more incompetent than that. Blair was a used cars salesman, a talented one who could sell water to the ocean. Cameron strikes me as a lucky bastard, who is in the right place at the right time.
Liberal Democrats
1. The leader is around 12 years old
2. Always finish 3rd. A throwaway vote.
3. Paul is right.. No other negatives but i bet that there isn't many positives either.
_________________
Guybrush: If I gave you your arm back, what would you do with it?
Murray: I'd terrorize the South Seas! I'd torture the living! I'd demolish the... er... What I meant to say was, I'd use it to pet kittens.
Guybrush: Nope. You blew it.
Murray: Drat

Tom- Forum Slayer
- Posts: 214
Join date: 2008-01-27
Location: Phoenix Court.
Permissions of this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum










